South Indian Bruce Lee Dhanush enjoys a huge fame in Tamil Nadu with his mass image. But his curious case filed by and old couple claiming that he was their son is now turning many twists.

After all the hearings, the Madras High Court has asked the old couple to submit any proofs like birth marks or others. As per the court’s advice, the old couple within some days has submitted the birth marks details of their alleged son Dhanush. The court has ordered a doctor’s team to check Dhanush’s birthmarks. To everyone’s surprise, the doctors made a detailed report which says that there are no birth marks on Dhanush as claimed by the old couple from Madurai. Here comes the twist that the same doctors said that some marks are removed by Laser. So the same court has asked the doctors to confirm the marks which match with old couple’s claimed spots whether they are removed by the laser or not. This is the new twist in this case as Dhanush who breathed a sigh of relief is now again back to square one on the problem.

Dhanush and his parents say that the old couple is claiming false news for Money whereas the old couple from Madurai is saying that Dhanush is the same person whom they lost when he was a child.

Making the most out of the Supreme Court’s decision in several cases that DNA test could not be ordered as a matter of course, the counsel fighting the paternity case for Dhanush asked the justice not to order the actor to go through DNA test.

The old couple claiming to be Dhanush’s biological parents are demanding an amount of Rs. 65,000 per month as a maintenance amount from Dhanush. This really looks a big amount to ask, and the question arises, “Why the old couple kept quiet for so many years?’ There are no answers.

Both the parties involved are submitting certificates and other details which are contradictory, further increasing the ambiguity regarding the claims made by both the parties.

The justice reserved his judgment for a later date while Dhanush strongly said, “No” to undergo DNA test as it is a matter of his privacy as an individual.